The Independent Healthcare Commission set up by four boroughs and
chaired by Michael Mansfield QC to look into the effects so far of the
implementation of the Shaping a Healthier Future proposals has extend
the deadline for submitting evidence to February 24th. This is the
evidence Brent fightback has submitted:
In addition to the points made in the BTUC submission which Brent Fightback endorses, we would like to add that effective out of hospital care, care in the community, cannot be provided if social care provided by the Council is slashed.
Brent Council's funding has been drastically cut and among their proposals to achieve a balanced budget are many cuts which will severely damage the quality of care available - in particular the reduction in time from 30 to 15 minutes for carers' visits which has been widely criticised by elderly peoples' charities as ineffective and dehumanising. Also the closure of the (ironically titled New Millenium Day Centre which caters for 80 plus people with complex mental and physical needs - the group SAHF proposals are supposed to focus on.
Also the withdrawal of any provision for rough sleepers who have a high level of unmet health needs and already a disproportionately high level of A&E attendances because they lack alternative means of care.
At the other end of their residents' lives, Brent Council proposes to close ten of its seventeen children's centres. As well as providing facilities for play and education, children's centres often host health services for under-fives including baby and child clinics and advice on health and diet for parents and their small children. Brent has a very poor record on child immunisation, dental health, child mental health and obesity. If these facilities are lost, the NHS primary care services will be put under even more strain.
This is the Submission made by Brent Trade Union Council
In addition to the points made in the BTUC submission which Brent Fightback endorses, we would like to add that effective out of hospital care, care in the community, cannot be provided if social care provided by the Council is slashed.
Brent Council's funding has been drastically cut and among their proposals to achieve a balanced budget are many cuts which will severely damage the quality of care available - in particular the reduction in time from 30 to 15 minutes for carers' visits which has been widely criticised by elderly peoples' charities as ineffective and dehumanising. Also the closure of the (ironically titled New Millenium Day Centre which caters for 80 plus people with complex mental and physical needs - the group SAHF proposals are supposed to focus on.
Also the withdrawal of any provision for rough sleepers who have a high level of unmet health needs and already a disproportionately high level of A&E attendances because they lack alternative means of care.
At the other end of their residents' lives, Brent Council proposes to close ten of its seventeen children's centres. As well as providing facilities for play and education, children's centres often host health services for under-fives including baby and child clinics and advice on health and diet for parents and their small children. Brent has a very poor record on child immunisation, dental health, child mental health and obesity. If these facilities are lost, the NHS primary care services will be put under even more strain.
This is the Submission made by Brent Trade Union Council
Over many years the Brent Trade Union Council
has campaigned with other concerned organisations and the local trade union
movement about the cuts to the local health service.Our colleagues in the
health service unions warned us that the removal of services from Central
Middlesex Hospital (CMH) would lead to the eventual closure of A & E.
Central Middlesex Hospital was rebuilt and
extensively modernised at a cost of more than £62 million, reopening fully in
2008. This modernisation was funded in large part by PFI and was specifically
designed for emergency medicine.
In spite of this, over the intervening years,
many services have been moved from CMH to Northwick Park Hospital in a far more
prosperous area. Services were transferred without consultation, because there
was no obligation to consult since the two hospitals were part of the same
trust. Staff were often given only a few days' notice that they were required
to transfer and eventually Central Middlesex was left without the back up
services needed for its A & E to remain viable. So we have a situation
where management moved the services, then used it as a justification for saying
that A & E was no longer safe or effective as maintaining an A & E
service is dependent on the full range of hospital services being available to
patients. Yet, right up to the day of its closure the A & E department at
CMH was still being sent patients from the overstretched departments at both
Northwick Park and St Mary's.
Having moved so many services to Northwick Park
and closed the A & E at Central Middlesex, the CCG is now responsible for a
splendid modern building which they will have to pay for until the end of the
PFI contract and the dilemma of how to make use of it.
Throughout these years, Primary care services
have been severely overstretched and continue to be so despite the Shaping a
Healthier Future organisation and the local CCG having a “vision” of improving
those services by investing to prevent illness, lessen the need for hospital
admissions and shorten the length of time patients need to spend in
hospital. Of course the BTUC supports
improvements in primary care, but promises were made that these improvements
would be in place before radical changes were made to hospital services.
However, they remain, to quote the CCG's own documents, “visions” and
“aspirations”.
There is a crisis in recruitment of GPs,
community nurses, health visitors and other staff needed to transform these
visions and aspirations into reality, just as there is a crisis of recruitment
for hospital staff and an expensive and destabilising reliance on agency staff.
BTUC believes that the government's refusal to pay NHS staff even the 1%
advised by their own pay review body and the housing crisis which is extreme in
Brent, contribute to the recruitment crisis in the NHS, while cuts to the
Council's budget threaten the provision of adequate social care, essential if
patients' needs are to be met in the community.
The two Brent wards closest to the hospital,
Stonebridge and Harlesden, are some of the most deprived in the Borough. The
Locality Profile for Harlesden makes for grim reading. Harlesden is ranked in
30s for deprivation for England.
Despite having a young population 32% below the
age of 20 years, in Harlesden ward, life expectancy is 13.4 years for men and
9.6 years for women less than the highest expectancy rate in Dudden Hill
ward. It can be described by a tube train journey. If you take the train from
Harlesden station and travel a few station north you will gain a decade in life
expectancy.
Chronic Illness is significantly higher when
compared to London and England figures, the biggest killers are Cancer,
Circulatory and Respiratory diseases.
Mental illness affects one in six residents, TB
is the second highest in the Borough and HIV is “considered to be very high”
(Locality Profile).
Too many Children are found to be obese in their
reception year when starting school and teenage pregnancies are also high.
We have only outlined a few items from the Brent
Locality Profile for Harlesden Ward but we want to emphasise how completely
unacceptable it is to close the A&E and other services in the middle of a
population that so desperately needs a proper A&E and the important the
general health services that go with it.
To compound this misery the facilities at
Northwick Park which is the A&E that is suppose to replace the CMH
facility, cannot cope with the extra load from the CMH and was rated as the
worst A&E in the country.
The near impossibility of using public transport
to go to Northwick Park. The difficulty of taking a sick child in the middle of
the night to the A&E does not bear thinking about. Again the Harlesden and
Stonebridge wards have the lowest levels of car ownership and minicab costs are
prohibitive for those on low incomes.
Brent Trades Council also want to support and be
associated with the submission from The Hammersmith and Charing Cross Save Our
Hospital Campaigns.
On behalf of the Brent Trades Union Council
please place our submission before Mr Mansfield.
Brent Fighback adds:
In addition to the points made in the
BTUC submission which Brent Fightback endorses, we would like to add that
effective out of hospital care, care in the community, cannot be provided if
social care provided by the Council is slashed.
Brent Council's funding has been
drastically cut and among their proposals to achieve a balanced budget are many
cuts which will severely damage the quality of care available - in particular
the reduction in time from 30 to 15 minutes for carers' visits which has been
widely criticised by elderly peoples' charities as ineffective and
dehumanising. Also the closure of the (ironically titled New Millenium Day
Centre which caters for 80 plus people with complex mental and physical needs -
the group SAHF proposals are supposed to focus on.
Also the withdrawal of any provision
for rough sleepers who have a high level of unmet health needs and already a
disproportionately high level of A&E attendances because they lack
alternative means of care.
At the other end of their residents'
lives, Brent Council proposes to close ten of its seventeen children's centres.
As well as providing facilities for play and education, children's centres
often host health services for under-fives including baby and child clinics and
advice on health and diet for parents and their small children. Brent has a
very poor record on child immunisation, dental health, child mental health and
obesity. If these facilities are lost, the NHS primary care services will be
put under even more strain.
Submissions should be made to: Peter Smith,
Clerk to the Commission, at Hammersmith & Fulham Council. Submissions should be
addressed to him at Room 39, Hammersmith Town Hall, London W6 9JU or sent by
email to peter.smith@lbhf.gov.uk. Later submissions will be forwarded to the
Commission but may not be given the same attention as those received by the
deadline.
Like us on Facebook
